Former U.S. President Barack Obama has condemned President Donald Trump’s plan to shut down the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), calling it a dangerous foreign policy mistake that could put millions of lives at risk. Taking to social media, Obama urged Congress to block the move, emphasizing that USAID has saved lives worldwide for decades.
“USAID has been fighting disease, feeding children, and promoting goodwill around the world for six decades. Dismantling this agency would be a profound foreign policy mistake—one that Congress should resist,” Obama stated.
His comments come amid growing backlash against Trump’s decision, which critics say could devastate vulnerable communities and weaken America’s global influence.
What Is USAID and Why Is It Important?
Founded in 1961 under President John F. Kennedy, USAID is the largest foreign aid agency in the world, operating in over 100 countries. It plays a crucial role in global health, food security, disaster relief, and economic development. The agency funds HIV/AIDS treatment, maternal healthcare, and vaccination programs, supports small-scale farmers, responds to natural disasters, and provides microloans to businesses in developing nations.
In 2023 alone, USAID distributed over $43 billion in aid, helping millions of people worldwide. Its programs have played a vital role in reducing poverty, combating disease, and promoting economic stability.
Why Does Trump Want to Scrap USAID?
President Trump and his administration argue that USAID is inefficient and politically biased, claiming that cutting foreign aid will save taxpayer money and refocus resources on domestic priorities. His administration believes that the agency’s funding is often mismanaged and that the U.S. should not be responsible for supporting other nations when there are economic challenges at home.
Tech billionaire Elon Musk, who was recently appointed to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, has backed Trump’s move, calling USAID “a radical-left operation that wastes billions.” The administration has already taken steps to weaken USAID, including freezing aid budgets, locking employees out of offices, and planning to merge the agency into the State Department. However, critics argue that these cuts are driven by ideology rather than efficiency and will cause global instability.
How Will Poor Countries Be Affected?
Millions of people in Africa, Asia, and Latin America rely on USAID-funded healthcare programs, including HIV/AIDS treatment, malaria prevention, and maternal health services. Without USAID’s support, HIV patients may lose access to life-saving treatment, malaria deaths could spike, and maternal mortality rates may rise due to the lack of proper healthcare.
Food security is another major concern. Programs like Feed the Future help farmers grow more food and combat malnutrition, but cutting USAID funding could increase hunger and food shortages. Many children in developing nations rely on school feeding programs funded by USAID, and without them, malnutrition rates could soar. The loss of economic development programs would also hit hard. USAID provides grants, business training, and microloans that help small businesses thrive. Without this support, entrepreneurs and farmers could lose their livelihoods, pushing millions into extreme poverty and triggering economic collapse in already fragile nations.
The potential shutdown of USAID could also weaken U.S. influence on the global stage. Foreign aid is not just an act of charity; it is a strategic tool that strengthens diplomatic ties and promotes stability. If the U.S. withdraws aid, China and Russia may step in, increasing their influence in developing countries. This shift could strengthen authoritarian regimes, fuel conflict in unstable regions, and diminish America’s role as a global leader.
Global Reactions to Trump’s USAID Cuts
The decision to scrap USAID has sparked widespread criticism from humanitarian organizations, lawmakers, and world leaders. Aid groups have warned that shutting down USAID could lead to a humanitarian catastrophe, with millions of people losing access to essential services. Many members of Congress, including some from Trump’s own party, have opposed the move, arguing that foreign aid is vital for U.S. national security and diplomacy.
International leaders have also expressed concern, warning that America’s decision to withdraw aid could destabilize developing regions and create new crises. Some governments have urged the U.S. to reconsider, emphasizing that USAID-funded projects have been crucial in improving public health, education, and economic development in their countries.
What Happens Next?
The future of USAID now depends on Congress, which must vote on Trump’s proposal. If lawmakers block the move, the agency could continue its operations. However, if the proposal is approved, USAID’s funding could be drastically reduced, or the agency may be shut down entirely.
The decision could have long-lasting consequences, affecting not only the millions of people who depend on USAID’s programs but also America’s global standing. The debate over USAID’s future highlights the broader issue of U.S. foreign aid and whether the country should continue playing a leading role in international development.
As the political battle unfolds, the question remains: Should the U.S. cut foreign aid, or is USAID too valuable to lose? Congress will soon decide, but the world is already watching.
Do you want to be published? Email info@thedailywhistle.co.ke or Whatsapp 0721 930 260
